Feasibility of precision smoking treatment in a low-income community setting: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial in The Southern Community Cohort Study

Table 3 Selection effects with respect to demographic traits and attitudes toward precision smoking treatment

	Enrolled (n = 92)		Engaged				Retained (n = 43)
	Enrolled (n = 92)		All (n = 58)		Received med (n = 43)		Retained (n = 43)
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)
Demographics
Age	0.99 [0.91, 1.07]		0.83* [0.73, 0.95]		0.93 [0.85, 1.08]		1.00 [0.91, 1.10]
Female sex	1.80 [0.66, 4.93]		2.44 [0.53, 11.23]		1.35 [0.39, 4.62]		0.79 [0.18, 3.36]
Black race	0.94 [0.29, 3.03]		3.44 [0.65, 18.20]		0.55 [0.14, 2.06]		1.18 [0.26, 5.32]
High school graduate	1.15 [0.39, 3.41]		3.88 [0.69, 21.92]		1.54 [0.46, 5.22]		1.02 [0.24, 4.41]
Household income < $15,000	0.61 [0.19, 2.00]		0.68 [0.10, 4.52]		0.56 [0.17, 1.79]		1.24 [0.36, 4.31]
Favorable attitude toward:
Nicotine metabolite ratio test		1.54 [0.51, 4.68]		1.71 [0.28, 10.49]		1.06 [0.25, 4.44]		1.28 [0.23, 7.20]
Polygenic risk score test		1.02 [0.31, 3.42]		1 (omitted)		0.37 [0.06, 2.31]		0.51 [0.07, 3.83]
p-value of model chi-squared test	0.803	0.725	0.126	0.560	0.503	0.485	0.999	0.801
Pseudo-R-squared	0.026	0.006	0.236	0.007	0.055	0.020	0.005	0.010

Each column reports adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] of a logistic regression of each stage of implementation (column header) on a set of explanatory variables (rows). “Engaged” refers to completion of the intervention counseling call; Columns 3 and 4 each comprise all participants who completed the intervention call, whereas Columns 5 and 6 each comprise all participants who both completed the intervention call and reported receiving their chosen smoking cessation medication during the study. “Retained” refers to completion of the 6-month follow-up survey
^*Significant at the 5% level

ISSN: 1940-0640