- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Does screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care increase receipt of substance use disorder treatment?
© Saitz et al 2015
- Published: 24 September 2015
- Primary Care Clinic
- Drug Dependence
- Primary Care Patient
- Composite International Diagnostic Interview
Little is known about the efficacy of "RT" (referral to treatment) for increasing receipt of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment by patients with unhealthy drug use identified by screening. We compared receipt of SUD treatment between baseline and 6 months across three randomized groups: no intervention and two different types of brief interventions.
Adults presenting to a hospital-based primary care clinic with recent drug use (Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test [ASSIST] drug specific scores of ¿4) were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing: (1) a 10-15 minute structured interview conducted by health educators (BNI), (2) a 30-45 minute intervention based on motivational interviewing by Masters-level counselors (MOTIV), or 3) no brief intervention. All received information on treatment resources. We assessed receipt of any SUD treatment in a statewide database. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for main drug (self-identified), drug dependence, and past SUD treatment.
Among 528 participants the main drug was marijuana (63%), cocaine (19%), and opioids (17%); 46% met 12-month drug dependence criteria (Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form); 18% had ASSIST scores (¿27) consistent with dependence (past 3-months). At 6 months, 14% (73/528) received any SUD treatment. There were no significant differences in SUD treatment receipt: BNI vs control (adusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.16, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.59, 2.30, Hochberg adjusted p-value=0.66); MOTIV vs control (AOR 0.45, 95%CI: 0.21, 0.97, Hochberg adjusted p-value=0.08). There were no significant interactions between intervention and main drug, severity (ASSIST), or prior SUD treatment.
Brief intervention did not increase receipt of SUD treatment in primary care patients. Future research should address how to make referral to treatment successful among screen-identified patients who could benefit from it.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.